Not surprisingly, Ethiopian officials dispute the HRW
report, saying that the relocations are in fact part of a national
“villagisation” program aimed at moving people from sparsely-populated regions
of marginal farmlands to establish villages in more fertile parts of the
nation. The Ethiopian government also
defends the policy of leasing land to foreign farmers, saying that it is meant
to be a kind of technology transfer arrangement, where Ethiopia can learn
modern, more-efficient farming techniques.
Of course the mass relocation begs the question of why foreign firms
would be willing to lease what Ethiopia is describing as “marginal” farmland in
the first place.
Such lease agreements aren't unique to Ethiopia though,
other African nations have been leasing large swaths of their own lands to
foreign farming concerns, chiefly from China, which has been investing heavily
in Africa in recent years. While African
nations were originally attracted to China's “no-strings-attached” approach to
foreign investment – as opposed to investment from Western nations, which
increasingly is tied to political reform and good-governance efforts – a slow
change has been taking place. Some
African nations are growing unhappy with the Chinese approach, where they not
only underwrite a major infrastructure project, but also import much of the
labor from China as well – African governments say that this prevents the type
of technology transfer that Ethiopia is touting from occurring. One sign of this changing attitude came last
year when challenger Michael Sata won Zambia's presidential election by running
on an anti-China platform.
No comments:
Post a Comment